After SOAR

BlinkOpsvTines

BlinkOps 5.82Tines 6.42

BlinkOps v Tines: the totals are 0.60 apart, outside the 0.25 band. Tines leads on the total; the rows below say why. Rows won: BlinkOps 0, Tines 2, level 7.

Blink Ops scores 5.82 and Tines 6.42 on the nine published criteria, a gap of 0.60 points. The deciding row is approvals: Tines scores 7.0 against 4.0 for Blink Ops. Blink Ops is an agentic security automation platform; Tines is a no-code workflow platform with agents. Every score rests on pages read on 2026-11-03.

The difference that decides BlinkOps v Tines

On approvals, Tines states governance, guardrails and monitoring on its home page, and coverage of its January 2026 AI layer cites human-in-the-loop controls (score 7.0), while Blink Ops has nothing on approvals in the pages read on 2026-11-03 (score 4.0). tines.com, read 2026-11-03

Rows with the widest weighted gap: Approvals and human-in-the-loop controls (Tines ahead by 3.0), Pricing model and transparency (Tines ahead by 3.0).

BlinkOps v Tines: the nine rows side by side

Playbook authoring model

weight 14 of 100

BlinkOps

8.0

No-code workflow builder and a no-code security AI agent builder; agents run inside workflows.

docs.blinkops.com, read 2026-11-03

Tines

8.0

No-code and low-code story builder; build AI agents, apps and automations; import and export of stories as files.

tines.com, read 2026-11-03; tines.com, read 2026-11-03

Integration count and depth documented

weight 14 of 100

BlinkOps

5.0

No official count found; third-party figures conflict (30,000 integrations versus 7,000 workflows and 500 agent templates).

docs.blinkops.com, read 2026-11-03

Tines

5.0

No integration count on the home page; positioned as vendor-agnostic. HTTP-based actions reach any API (not read on a docs page).

tines.com, read 2026-11-03

Case management and collaboration

weight 8 of 100

BlinkOps

4.0

Not found in the pages read on 2026-11-03.

docs.blinkops.com, read 2026-11-03

Tines

4.0

Not found in the pages read on 2026-11-03.

tines.com, read 2026-11-03

Approvals and human-in-the-loop controls

weight 12 of 100

BlinkOps

4.0

Not found in the pages read on 2026-11-03.

docs.blinkops.com, read 2026-11-03

Tines

7.0Ahead

Home page states governance, guardrails and monitoring, and that you choose where and when models are used. Coverage of the January 2026 AI interaction layer cites human-in-the-loop controls and audit logging (search summary).

tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) (search summary only); tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) (search summary only)

Agentic or AI features that are documented

weight 12 of 100

BlinkOps

7.0

Agent builder with agent-to-agent collaboration and deterministic workflows (April 2025 launch). Limits not stated.

docs.blinkops.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)

Tines

7.0

AI SOC for alert intake, triage and remediation with routing to an analyst; agents inside stories. Tines 3B (July 2026) is reported by a competitor; Tines' blog read does not carry the launch post.

tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim); tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)

Hosting and data residency options

weight 8 of 100

BlinkOps

6.0

AppSource listing says automations can run on Blink's cloud or on-prem through runners; runner docs not read.

docs.blinkops.com, read 2026-11-03 (search summary only)

Tines

6.0

Pricing page says 'flexible hosting options are available' and names none. A self-hosted tenant is mentioned in import docs.

tines.com, read 2026-11-03; tines.com, read 2026-11-03

Pricing model and transparency

weight 8 of 100

BlinkOps

3.0

No published price found.

docs.blinkops.com, read 2026-11-03

Tines

6.0Ahead

A free edition (3 live workflows, one-time USD 50 AI allowance) is published; paid editions are by request with no pricing unit.

tines.com, read 2026-11-03

Migration tooling and import or export formats

weight 14 of 100

BlinkOps

6.0

Blink's migration page, read 2026-11-03, names Splunk SOAR as the source and says its import tooling maps playbooks, custom functions and SplunkBase apps on a four-week plan (vendor claim, marketing page, no technical documentation read). It names no other source.

go.blinkops.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)

Tines

6.0

Tines' help article, read 2026-11-03, names the format: stories export as JSON with credentials, resources and event data excluded and import with a Replace option, while the docs page itself does not name the format, no inbound SOAR converter was found, and a library story moves Splunk SOAR case records, not logic.

explained.tines.com, read 2026-11-03; tines.com, read 2026-11-03

Ownership stability

weight 10 of 100

BlinkOps

8.0

Independent; USD 50M Series B in July 2025.

blinkops.com, read 2026-11-03

Tines

8.0

Independent; USD 125M round led by Goldman Sachs Alternatives in February 2025 at about USD 1.13B. Product naming changed in 2026 (Tines Stories and 3B).

pymnts.com, read 2026-11-03 (search summary only); tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (search summary only)

The verdict for BlinkOps v Tines, by buyer type

Splunk shop
Blink Ops fits better, because it claims import tooling and a four-week plan for Splunk SOAR playbooks (vendor claim); Tines moves Splunk SOAR case records through a library story, though not playbook logic.
small team
Tines fits better, because it publishes a free edition with 3 live workflows and a one-time 50 USD AI allowance; Blink Ops publishes no price.
regulated or air-gapped
Tines fits better, because it lists a self-hosted deployment in its docs sidebar; Blink Ops says automations can run on-prem through runners, per an AppSource listing.

When to pick each

Pick BlinkOps when

Pick Blink Ops when you are a Splunk shop and you want a tool that claims import tooling and a four-week plan for Splunk SOAR playbooks (vendor claim).

Pick Tines when

Pick Tines when you are a small team and you want a tool that publishes a free edition with 3 live workflows and a one-time 50 USD AI allowance.

Moving playbooks between BlinkOps and Tines

The portability matrix records seven playbook types for each direction it covers. Verdicts are documentation findings, not test results. How the matrix is built.

Tines to BlinkOps
Playbook typeVerdictReason
Enrichment lookups rebuild from scratchTines documents story JSON, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Blink Ops, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Phishing triage rebuild from scratchTines documents story JSON, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Blink Ops, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Endpoint containment rebuild from scratchTines documents story JSON, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Blink Ops, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Identity actions rebuild from scratchTines documents story JSON, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Blink Ops, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Ticketing and case sync rebuild from scratchTines documents story JSON, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Blink Ops, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Custom scripted logic rebuild from scratchTines custom logic is Python Run script action, but Blink Ops documents no importer for it, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Scheduled or batch jobs rebuild from scratchTines documents story JSON, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Blink Ops, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03

Profiles

BlinkOps. Tines. Alternatives: instead of BlinkOps, instead of Tines.