TinesvTorq

Tines documents a no-code and low-code story builder, agents and apps, with stories that import and export as files (Tines docs, 2026-11-03). Torq's own page describes low-code and full-code builders, natural-language workflow creation and agentic runbooks for hunting (vendor claim, 2026-11-03). Neither side states what its AI authoring cannot build. The row is a draw. tines.com, read 2026-11-03

Neither home page read on 2026-11-03 publishes an integration count. Tines says it reaches any API through HTTP-based actions and was not read on a docs page. A third party reports 300 integrations and 4,000+ pre-built steps for Torq, and that figure is not on Torq's own page, so it does not count. Both publish nothing on this point, and both rows carry a re-read flag. The row is a draw. torq.io, read 2026-11-03

Torq's page describes a Manage module that creates, assigns and manages cases from one record (vendor claim, 2026-11-03). The Tines pages scored show no case management, so the row is 4.0 and carries a re-read flag: Tines' docs sidebar also lists a Cases section that the scoring pass did not open. The row goes to Torq, and it is worth 0.32 of the 0.35 total gap. torq.io, read 2026-11-03

Torq's page says response can run fully autonomously or with human-on-the-loop oversight, with a manual override and transparent audit logs (vendor claim, 2026-11-03); per-action gating was not read. Tines states governance, guardrails and monitoring on its home page (vendor claim), and its human-in-the-loop and audit logging detail comes from a search summary only. The row goes to Torq by one point. torq.io, read 2026-11-03

Torq lists agents for triage, investigation, response, hunting and reporting on a context model that records verdicts, exceptions and overrides, and states no limits for them (vendor claim, 2026-11-03). Its claim that over 90 percent of cases close autonomously is reported by third parties and is not on the page read, so it is not scored. Tines describes an AI SOC for intake, triage and remediation with agents inside stories (vendor claim); its Tines 3B launch of July 2026 is reported by a competitor and its own blog read does not carry it. The row goes to Torq. torq.io, read 2026-11-03

Tines' pricing page says flexible hosting options are available and names none, and its import docs mention a self-hosted tenant (2026-11-03). Torq is described as cloud-native with SOC 2, HIPAA and ISO certifications by a third-party reading, and no regions or self-hosted option were read. Both rows are thin. The row goes to Tines by one point. tines.com, read 2026-11-03

Tines publishes a free edition with 3 live workflows and a one-time 50 USD AI allowance, and sells paid editions by request with no pricing unit (Tines pricing page, 2026-11-03). Torq shows no price on its home page, and its pricing URL returned 404 on the read date. The row goes to Tines and is worth 0.24 of the total, which offsets most of Torq's case management lead. tines.com, read 2026-11-03

Torq exports and imports workflows as YAML, including custom steps, nested workflows and tags (Torq knowledge base, 2026-11-03). Tines documents story export and import across tenants with a replace option, and leaves out credentials and event data (Tines docs, 2026-11-03). Neither side publishes a converter from XSOAR or Splunk SOAR, and Torq's Kill Your SOAR guide sits behind a form and was not read. Both publish nothing on inbound conversion. The row is a draw. kb.torq.io, read 2026-11-03

Torq announced a 140M USD Series D at a 1.2B USD valuation on 2026-01-12 (Business Wire, read 2026-11-03) and acquired Jit on 2026-05-19. Tines is independent after a 125M USD round led by Goldman Sachs Alternatives in February 2025 at about 1.13B USD (PYMNTS, read 2026-11-03), and renamed parts of its product in 2026. The row goes to Torq by half a point. businesswire.com, read 2026-11-03