CywarevTines
Cyware 7.24Tines 6.42
Cyware v Tines: the totals are 0.82 apart, outside the 0.25 band. Cyware leads on the total; the rows below say why. Rows won: Cyware 6, Tines 2, level 1.
The difference that decides Cyware v Tines
On integration depth, Cyware states 400+ integrations by webhook, API and prebuilt connector (vendor claim, score 8.5), while Tines states no integration count and reaches APIs through HTTP actions (score 5.0). cyware.com, read 2026-11-03
Rows with the widest weighted gap: Integration count and depth documented (Cyware ahead by 3.5), Case management and collaboration (Cyware ahead by 3.0), Pricing model and transparency (Tines ahead by 2.0).
Cyware v Tines: the nine rows side by side
Playbook authoring model
weight 14 of 100Cyware
8.5Ahead
Drag-and-drop designer, low-code Python editor and 150+ playbook templates; AI playbook builder, code generator and run-log debugger.
cyware.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Integration count and depth documented
weight 14 of 100Cyware
8.5Ahead
400+ tool integrations by webhook, API and prebuilt connector (vendor claim).
cyware.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Tines
5.0
No integration count on the home page; positioned as vendor-agnostic. HTTP-based actions reach any API (not read on a docs page).
tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Case management and collaboration
weight 8 of 100Cyware
7.0Ahead
Cyware Respond is sold as case management and incident response; details not read on a Cyware docs page.
cyware.com, read 2026-11-03
Approvals and human-in-the-loop controls
weight 12 of 100Cyware
8.0Ahead
Approve and run critical automation decisions from the enterprise mobile app; playbook version control with audit trails.
cyware.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Tines
7.0
Home page states governance, guardrails and monitoring, and that you choose where and when models are used. Coverage of the January 2026 AI interaction layer cites human-in-the-loop controls and audit logging (search summary).
tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) (search summary only); tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) (search summary only)
Agentic or AI features that are documented
weight 12 of 100Cyware
8.0Ahead
AI playbook builder, code generator and run-log debugger on Orchestrate; Agentic AI Fabric announced 2026-03-18 across threat intel and response.
cyware.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim); cyware.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Hosting and data residency options
weight 8 of 100Cyware
7.0Ahead
Cloud-to-on-prem hybrid through lightweight integrator agents that avoid exposing internal networks. Respond's fully on-prem status unconfirmed.
cyware.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Pricing model and transparency
weight 8 of 100Tines
6.0Ahead
A free edition (3 live workflows, one-time USD 50 AI allowance) is published; paid editions are by request with no pricing unit.
tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Migration tooling and import or export formats
weight 14 of 100Cyware
5.0
The Orchestrate product page lists "import/export playbooks" (vendor claim) and names no file format and no source platform, so under the printed rule the row sits at 5.0, the same as an unnamed translation claim.
cyware.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Tines
6.0Ahead
Tines' help article, read 2026-11-03, names the format: stories export as JSON with credentials, resources and event data excluded and import with a Replace option, while the docs page itself does not name the format, no inbound SOAR converter was found, and a library story moves Splunk SOAR case records, not logic.
explained.tines.com, read 2026-11-03; tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Ownership stability
weight 10 of 100Cyware
8.0
Independent; no 2026 acquisition found. SOAR is one product line inside a threat-intelligence-led company.
cyware.com, read 2026-11-03 (search summary only)
Tines
8.0
Independent; USD 125M round led by Goldman Sachs Alternatives in February 2025 at about USD 1.13B. Product naming changed in 2026 (Tines Stories and 3B).
pymnts.com, read 2026-11-03 (search summary only); tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (search summary only)
The verdict for Cyware v Tines, by buyer type
- Microsoft shop
- Cyware fits better, because it announced a Microsoft partnership on 2025-10-22 under which Sentinel ingests Cyware threat intelligence (vendor claim); Tines documents nothing for this buyer type on the pages read.
- Splunk shop
- Tines fits better, because it moves Splunk SOAR case records through a library story, though not playbook logic; Cyware documents nothing for this buyer type on the pages read.
- small team
- Tines fits better, because it publishes a free edition with 3 live workflows and a one-time 50 USD AI allowance; Cyware scopes price per engagement and publishes none.
When to pick each
Pick Cyware when
Pick Cyware when you are a Microsoft shop and you want a tool that announced a Microsoft partnership on 2025-10-22 under which Sentinel ingests Cyware threat intelligence (vendor claim).
Pick Tines when
Pick Tines when you are a small team and you want a tool that publishes a free edition with 3 live workflows and a one-time 50 USD AI allowance.
Profiles
Cyware. Tines. Alternatives: instead of Cyware, instead of Tines.