Google Security OperationsvTines
Google Security Operations 5.98Tines 6.42
Google Security Operations v Tines: the totals are 0.44 apart, outside the 0.25 band. Tines leads on the total; the rows below say why. Rows won: Google Security Operations 2, Tines 3, level 4.
The difference that decides Google Security Operations v Tines
On approvals, Tines states governance, guardrails and monitoring, with human-in-the-loop controls reported only in a search summary (vendor claim, score 7.0), while Google SecOps SOAR had no approval step in the pages scored on 2026-11-03 (score 4.0). tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Rows with the widest weighted gap: Approvals and human-in-the-loop controls (Tines ahead by 3.0), Pricing model and transparency (Tines ahead by 3.0), Agentic or AI features that are documented (Google Security Operations ahead by 1.5).
Google Security Operations v Tines: the nine rows side by side
Playbook authoring model
weight 14 of 100Google Security Operations
8.0
Visual playbook designer with blocks (nested playbooks), triggers, conditions; Gemini can create and edit playbooks.
docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03; docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Integration count and depth documented
weight 14 of 100Google Security Operations
6.0Ahead
Content Hub and Marketplace carry commercial, community and custom integrations; no count read.
docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03; cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Tines
5.0
No integration count on the home page; positioned as vendor-agnostic. HTTP-based actions reach any API (not read on a docs page).
tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Case management and collaboration
weight 8 of 100Google Security Operations
4.0
Not found in the pages read on 2026-11-03. Case objects were not read.
docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Approvals and human-in-the-loop controls
weight 12 of 100Google Security Operations
4.0
Not found in the pages read on 2026-11-03.
docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Tines
7.0Ahead
Home page states governance, guardrails and monitoring, and that you choose where and when models are used. Coverage of the January 2026 AI interaction layer cites human-in-the-loop controls and audit logging (search summary).
tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) (search summary only); tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) (search summary only)
Agentic or AI features that are documented
weight 12 of 100Google Security Operations
8.5Ahead
Gemini playbook creation is documented with explicit limits: no playbook blocks, no parallel actions, only installed integrations, no integration instances; editing cannot change conditions through prompts. Preview or GA status is not stated on the page.
docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Hosting and data residency options
weight 8 of 100Google Security Operations
4.0
Not found in the pages read on 2026-11-03. Regions and residency not read.
docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Pricing model and transparency
weight 8 of 100Google Security Operations
3.0
Not found in the pages read on 2026-11-03.
cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Tines
6.0Ahead
A free edition (3 live workflows, one-time USD 50 AI allowance) is published; paid editions are by request with no pricing unit.
tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Migration tooling and import or export formats
weight 14 of 100Google Security Operations
6.0
Google's playbook page, read 2026-11-03, names the format: Export and Import moves playbooks and blocks between staging and production, the system accepts only ZIP files for import, and no importer from another vendor was found.
cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Tines
6.0
Tines' help article, read 2026-11-03, names the format: stories export as JSON with credentials, resources and event data excluded and import with a Replace option, while the docs page itself does not name the format, no inbound SOAR converter was found, and a library story moves Splunk SOAR case records, not logic.
explained.tines.com, read 2026-11-03; tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Ownership stability
weight 10 of 100Google Security Operations
8.0
Google Cloud product (formerly Siemplify). No end-of-sale notice found; the Marketplace page is written for standalone SOAR customers.
cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03 (search summary only)
Tines
8.0
Independent; USD 125M round led by Goldman Sachs Alternatives in February 2025 at about USD 1.13B. Product naming changed in 2026 (Tines Stories and 3B).
pymnts.com, read 2026-11-03 (search summary only); tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (search summary only)
The verdict for Google Security Operations v Tines, by buyer type
- Splunk shop
- Tines fits better, because it moves Splunk SOAR case records through a library story, though not playbook logic; Google SecOps SOAR documents nothing for this buyer type on the pages read.
- small team
- Tines fits better, because it publishes a free edition with 3 live workflows and a one-time 50 USD AI allowance; Google SecOps SOAR sells in packages with no published price.
- regulated or air-gapped
- Tines fits better, because it lists a self-hosted deployment in its docs sidebar; Google SecOps SOAR documents nothing for this buyer type on the pages read.
When to pick each
Pick Google Security Operations when
Pick Google SecOps SOAR when you are agent-first and you want a tool that documents Gemini playbook creation with its limits stated, though Tines matches it on that point.
Pick Tines when
Pick Tines when you are a small team and you want a tool that publishes a free edition with 3 live workflows and a one-time 50 USD AI allowance.
Moving playbooks between Google Security Operations and Tines
The portability matrix records seven playbook types for each direction it covers. Verdicts are documentation findings, not test results. How the matrix is built.
| Playbook type | Verdict | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Enrichment lookups | rebuild from scratch | Tines' legacy SOAR migration post (read via a third-party summary) names no source platform or converter, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
| Phishing triage | rebuild from scratch | Tines' legacy SOAR migration post (read via a third-party summary) names no source platform or converter, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
| Endpoint containment | rebuild from scratch | Tines' legacy SOAR migration post (read via a third-party summary) names no source platform or converter, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
| Identity actions | rebuild from scratch | Tines' legacy SOAR migration post (read via a third-party summary) names no source platform or converter, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
| Ticketing and case sync | rebuild from scratch | Tines' legacy SOAR migration post (read via a third-party summary) names no source platform or converter, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
| Custom scripted logic | rebuild from scratch | Tines' legacy SOAR migration post (read via a third-party summary) names no source platform or converter, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
| Scheduled or batch jobs | rebuild from scratch | Tines' legacy SOAR migration post (read via a third-party summary) names no source platform or converter, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
| Playbook type | Verdict | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Enrichment lookups | rebuild from scratch | Tines documents story JSON, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Google SecOps SOAR, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
| Phishing triage | rebuild from scratch | Tines documents story JSON, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Google SecOps SOAR, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
| Endpoint containment | rebuild from scratch | Tines documents story JSON, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Google SecOps SOAR, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
| Identity actions | rebuild from scratch | Tines documents story JSON, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Google SecOps SOAR, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
| Ticketing and case sync | rebuild from scratch | Tines documents story JSON, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Google SecOps SOAR, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
| Custom scripted logic | rebuild from scratch | Tines custom logic is Python Run script action, but Google SecOps SOAR documents no importer for it, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
| Scheduled or batch jobs | rebuild from scratch | Tines documents story JSON, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Google SecOps SOAR, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. tines.com, read 2026-11-03 |
Profiles
Google Security Operations. Tines. Alternatives: instead of Google Security Operations, instead of Tines.