Mate SecurityvTines
Mate Security 6.22Tines 6.42
Mate Security v Tines: the totals are 0.20 apart, inside the 0.25 band. They are a band, not a ladder, so read the rows that decide the pair. Rows won: Mate Security 3, Tines 4, level 2.
The difference that decides Mate Security v Tines
On hosting and residency, Tines says 'flexible hosting options are available' and names none (score 6.0), while Mate states no deployment model or data residency (score 3.5). tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Rows with the widest weighted gap: Hosting and data residency options (Tines ahead by 2.5), Approvals and human-in-the-loop controls (Mate Security ahead by 1.5), Playbook authoring model (Tines ahead by 1.0).
Mate Security v Tines: the nine rows side by side
Playbook authoring model
weight 14 of 100Mate Security
7.0
Not a playbook builder. Documented answer: a Gamebook describes investigative intent, required evidence, permitted actions and escalation points in plain language; Mate says it tests the description against past cases and runs it in shadow mode before sign-off. Tool contact sits in separate Flows that Mate maintains.
mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim); mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Integration count and depth documented
weight 14 of 100Mate Security
5.0
Platform page lists ten integration categories (Slack, ticketing, Microsoft identity and mail, cloud risk, email security, threat intel, EDR, Google, identity context) and names Defender and AWS IAM actions. No count.
mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Tines
5.0
No integration count on the home page; positioned as vendor-agnostic. HTTP-based actions reach any API (not read on a docs page).
tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Case management and collaboration
weight 8 of 100Mate Security
5.0Ahead
No case management product. Documents an investigations dashboard with priority, status and analyst notes and a ticket-context integration.
mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Approvals and human-in-the-loop controls
weight 12 of 100Mate Security
8.5Ahead
Three autonomy modes on the platform page: Recommend only, Supervised (risky changes still ask) and Auto-run under guardrails and audit; Gamebooks define when the agent must escalate, stop or ask for approval.
mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim); mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Tines
7.0
Home page states governance, guardrails and monitoring, and that you choose where and when models are used. Coverage of the January 2026 AI interaction layer cites human-in-the-loop controls and audit logging (search summary).
tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) (search summary only); tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) (search summary only)
Agentic or AI features that are documented
weight 12 of 100Mate Security
8.0Ahead
Agents on a Security Context Graph for triage, investigation, response and hunting. Mate's own figures (98.7 percent accuracy on 7,200 alerts, 97 percent false-positive auto-closure) are unaudited vendor claims; the page does not give who measured. Agents do not hold open access to systems; Flows make the tool calls.
mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim); siliconangle.com, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Hosting and data residency options
weight 8 of 100Mate Security
3.5
Platform page and home page do not state deployment model or data residency; a Trust Center and compliance badges are shown.
mate.security, read 2026-11-03
Pricing model and transparency
weight 8 of 100Mate Security
6.0
A USD 150,000 per 12 months Enterprise tier list price appears on AWS Marketplace with private offers by email; mate.security itself publishes no price.
aws.amazon.com, read 2026-11-03
Tines
6.0
A free edition (3 live workflows, one-time USD 50 AI allowance) is published; paid editions are by request with no pricing unit.
tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Migration tooling and import or export formats
weight 14 of 100Mate Security
5.0
Mate says it translates SOAR playbooks into Gamebooks and its blog cites one unnamed customer's 711 playbooks becoming 10 Gamebooks (vendor claim). The pages name no source platform and no format, and no export of Gamebooks is documented, so the claim sits at the floor of the partial band and the matrix scores it as no documented path.
mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim); mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Tines
6.0Ahead
Tines' help article, read 2026-11-03, names the format: stories export as JSON with credentials, resources and event data excluded and import with a Replace option, while the docs page itself does not name the format, no inbound SOAR converter was found, and a library story moves Splunk SOAR case records, not logic.
explained.tines.com, read 2026-11-03; tines.com, read 2026-11-03
Ownership stability
weight 10 of 100Mate Security
7.0
Independent; SiliconANGLE reports a USD 35M Series A led by Canaan in July 2026 and more than USD 50M raised in total. Founded recently; Gamebooks reached general availability on 2026-08-26.
siliconangle.com, read 2026-11-03
Tines
8.0Ahead
Independent; USD 125M round led by Goldman Sachs Alternatives in February 2025 at about USD 1.13B. Product naming changed in 2026 (Tines Stories and 3B).
pymnts.com, read 2026-11-03 (search summary only); tines.com, read 2026-11-03 (search summary only)
The verdict for Mate Security v Tines, by buyer type
- small team
- Tines fits better, because it publishes a free edition with 3 live workflows and a one-time 50 USD AI allowance; Mate lists 150,000 USD per 12 months for its Enterprise tier on AWS Marketplace and no smaller tier.
- regulated or air-gapped
- Tines fits better, because it lists a self-hosted deployment in its docs sidebar; Mate documents nothing for this buyer type on the pages read.
- agent-first
- Mate fits better, because it documents three autonomy modes and Gamebooks that set when agents must escalate, stop or ask for approval (vendor claim); Tines runs agents inside stories and an AI SOC for triage and remediation (vendor claim).
When to pick each
Pick Mate Security when
Pick Mate when you are agent-first and you want a tool that documents three autonomy modes and Gamebooks that set when agents must escalate, stop or ask for approval (vendor claim).
Pick Tines when
Pick Tines when you are a small team and you want a tool that publishes a free edition with 3 live workflows and a one-time 50 USD AI allowance.
Moving playbooks between Mate Security and Tines
The portability matrix records seven playbook types for each direction it covers. Verdicts are documentation findings, not test results. How the matrix is built.
| Playbook type | Verdict | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Enrichment lookups | rebuild from scratch | Mate says it translates SOAR playbooks into Gamebooks of investigative intent but its page names no source platform or format, so no documented path on 2026-11-03 (vendor claim, unverified). mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) |
| Phishing triage | rebuild from scratch | Mate says it translates SOAR playbooks into Gamebooks of investigative intent but its page names no source platform or format, so no documented path on 2026-11-03 (vendor claim, unverified). mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) |
| Endpoint containment | rebuild from scratch | Mate says it translates SOAR playbooks into Gamebooks of investigative intent but its page names no source platform or format, so no documented path on 2026-11-03 (vendor claim, unverified). mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) |
| Identity actions | rebuild from scratch | Mate says it translates SOAR playbooks into Gamebooks of investigative intent but its page names no source platform or format, so no documented path on 2026-11-03 (vendor claim, unverified). mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) |
| Ticketing and case sync | rebuild from scratch | Mate describes Gamebooks as investigation procedures and no page covers case sync, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. mate.security, read 2026-11-03 |
| Custom scripted logic | rebuild from scratch | Mate says "your custom logic stays" after translation but names no source platform, format or mechanism, so no documented path on 2026-11-03 (vendor claim, unverified). mate.security, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) |
| Scheduled or batch jobs | rebuild from scratch | Mate describes Gamebooks as investigation procedures and no page covers scheduled or batch jobs, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. mate.security, read 2026-11-03 |
Profiles
Mate Security. Tines. Alternatives: instead of Mate Security, instead of Tines.