After SOAR

Instead of Torq

Torq scores 6.77 of 10 and sits 2 of 12 on the card. The gaps below are the reasons a team looks elsewhere. Each alternative is placed by what it answers.

Where Torq leaves gaps

Every customer metric on the Torq customers page is a case-study headline with no method, for example 7 analyst hours a day saved at Valvoline and a 92 percent cut in mean time to respond at an unnamed pharma customer. torq.io, read 2026-11-03

  • No native git sync was found in the pages read. Export and import are described as suited to migration and version control, and workflow revisions exist, but nothing documents a repository link. kb.torq.io, read 2026-11-03
  • The limits of Torq's agents are not stated on the pages read, and its over 90 percent of cases closed autonomously figure is a vendor claim reported by third parties and absent from the page read. torq.io, read 2026-11-03

Where Torq scores lowest on the rubric

  • Pricing model and transparency, 3.0 of 10: No price on the home page; its pricing URL returned 404. Review sites report demo-only pricing and no free trial. torq.io, read 2026-11-03
  • Integration count and depth documented, 5.0 of 10: The torq.io home page read states no count. A third party reading Torq pages reports 300 integrations and 4,000+ pre-built steps; confirm on Torq's own page before publishing. torq.io, read 2026-11-03
  • Hosting and data residency options, 5.0 of 10: Described as cloud-native with SOC 2, HIPAA and ISO certifications per third-party reading; no regions or self-hosted option read. torq.io, read 2026-11-03

The alternatives, in the order that answers the gaps

  1. Splunk SOAR (Cisco), 6.68 of 10. Splunk SOAR is third at 6.68. Release notes state where its agents run and that they build automation and do not decide cases, which answers the limits gap. It documents a repository setting on import. Splunk SOAR (Cisco) v Torq.
  2. Microsoft Sentinel, 6.21 of 10. Microsoft Sentinel is seventh at 6.21. Playbook templates are ARM templates that Microsoft says can be stored in source control and deployed by pipeline, which answers the repository gap. Microsoft Sentinel v Torq.
  3. Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, 6.18 of 10. Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR is eighth at 6.18. Content packs use a versioned layout with a command line tool, which answers the repository gap. Its approvals page is silent. Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR v Torq.
  4. Swimlane (Turbine), 6.14 of 10. Swimlane is ninth at 6.14. It documents a git integration to GitHub or GitLab, without branching, which answers the repository gap in part. Its AI figures are also vendor claims. Swimlane (Turbine) v Torq.
  5. Google Security Operations, 5.98 of 10. Google Security Operations is tenth at 5.98. Its Gemini playbook documentation lists what it cannot create, which answers the limits gap. Pricing is contact sales. Google Security Operations v Torq.

Torq on its own: profile. If you are leaving it, see the portability matrix.