Google Security OperationsvTorq
Google Security Operations 5.98Torq 6.77
Google Security Operations v Torq: the totals are 0.79 apart, outside the 0.25 band. Torq leads on the total; the rows below say why. Rows won: Google Security Operations 1, Torq 4, level 4.
The difference that decides Google Security Operations v Torq
On approvals, Torq runs autonomously or with human-on-the-loop oversight, with manual override and audit logs (vendor claim, score 8.0), while Google SecOps SOAR had no approval step in the pages scored on 2026-11-03 (score 4.0). torq.io, read 2026-11-03
Rows with the widest weighted gap: Approvals and human-in-the-loop controls (Torq ahead by 4.0), Case management and collaboration (Torq ahead by 4.0), Integration count and depth documented (Google Security Operations ahead by 1.0).
Google Security Operations v Torq: the nine rows side by side
Playbook authoring model
weight 14 of 100Google Security Operations
8.0
Visual playbook designer with blocks (nested playbooks), triggers, conditions; Gemini can create and edit playbooks.
docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03; docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Torq
8.0
Low-code and full-code workflow builder; natural-language workflow creation and agentic runbooks for hunting.
torq.io, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim) (search summary only)
Integration count and depth documented
weight 14 of 100Google Security Operations
6.0Ahead
Content Hub and Marketplace carry commercial, community and custom integrations; no count read.
docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03; cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Torq
5.0
The torq.io home page read states no count. A third party reading Torq pages reports 300 integrations and 4,000+ pre-built steps; confirm on Torq's own page before publishing.
torq.io, read 2026-11-03
Case management and collaboration
weight 8 of 100Google Security Operations
4.0
Not found in the pages read on 2026-11-03. Case objects were not read.
docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Torq
8.0Ahead
A 'Manage' module creates, assigns and manages cases from one record, per the vendor page.
torq.io, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Approvals and human-in-the-loop controls
weight 12 of 100Google Security Operations
4.0
Not found in the pages read on 2026-11-03.
docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Torq
8.0Ahead
Vendor page: response can run completely autonomously or with human-on-the-loop oversight, with a manual override and transparent audit logs. Per-action gating detail not read.
torq.io, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Agentic or AI features that are documented
weight 12 of 100Google Security Operations
8.5
Gemini playbook creation is documented with explicit limits: no playbook blocks, no parallel actions, only installed integrations, no integration instances; editing cannot change conditions through prompts. Preview or GA status is not stated on the page.
docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Torq
8.5
Agents for triage, investigation, response, hunting and reporting on a continuously updated context model that records verdicts, exceptions and overrides. Limits of the agents are not stated. 'Over 90 percent of cases closed autonomously' is a vendor claim reported by third parties; not on the page read.
torq.io, read 2026-11-03 (vendor claim)
Hosting and data residency options
weight 8 of 100Google Security Operations
4.0
Not found in the pages read on 2026-11-03. Regions and residency not read.
docs.cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Torq
5.0Ahead
Described as cloud-native with SOC 2, HIPAA and ISO certifications per third-party reading; no regions or self-hosted option read.
torq.io, read 2026-11-03
Pricing model and transparency
weight 8 of 100Google Security Operations
3.0
Not found in the pages read on 2026-11-03.
cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Torq
3.0
No price on the home page; its pricing URL returned 404. Review sites report demo-only pricing and no free trial.
torq.io, read 2026-11-03
Migration tooling and import or export formats
weight 14 of 100Google Security Operations
6.0
Google's playbook page, read 2026-11-03, names the format: Export and Import moves playbooks and blocks between staging and production, the system accepts only ZIP files for import, and no importer from another vendor was found.
cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03
Torq
6.0
Workflows export and import as YAML including custom steps, nested workflows and tags. No converter from XSOAR or Splunk SOAR found; a 'Kill Your SOAR' guide is behind a form.
kb.torq.io, read 2026-11-03
Ownership stability
weight 10 of 100Google Security Operations
8.0
Google Cloud product (formerly Siemplify). No end-of-sale notice found; the Marketplace page is written for standalone SOAR customers.
cloud.google.com, read 2026-11-03 (search summary only)
Torq
8.5Ahead
Independent. USD 140M Series D at USD 1.2B valuation announced 2026-01-12; USD 332M raised in total per press.
businesswire.com, read 2026-11-03
The verdict for Google Security Operations v Torq, by buyer type
- Microsoft shop
- Neither Google SecOps SOAR nor Torq documents anything for this buyer type on the pages read.
- agent-first
- Torq fits better, because it runs agents for triage, investigation, response and hunting on a context model that records overrides (vendor claim); Google SecOps SOAR documents Gemini playbook creation with its limits stated.
- leaving a legacy SOAR
- Torq fits better, because it advises redesign over lift and shift and names no converter; Google SecOps SOAR documents nothing for this buyer type on the pages read.
When to pick each
Pick Google Security Operations when
Pick Google SecOps SOAR when documented AI features is the row you weigh most, since it documents Gemini playbook creation with stated limits: no playbook blocks, no parallel actions, only installed integrations.
Pick Torq when
Pick Torq when you are agent-first and you want a tool that runs agents for triage, investigation, response and hunting on a context model that records overrides (vendor claim).
Moving playbooks between Google Security Operations and Torq
The portability matrix records seven playbook types for each direction it covers. Verdicts are documentation findings, not test results. How the matrix is built.
| Playbook type | Verdict | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Enrichment lookups | rebuild from scratch | Torq advises redesign over lift and shift and names no converter, its migration guide is gated and unread, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
| Phishing triage | rebuild from scratch | Torq advises redesign over lift and shift and names no converter, its migration guide is gated and unread, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
| Endpoint containment | rebuild from scratch | Torq advises redesign over lift and shift and names no converter, its migration guide is gated and unread, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
| Identity actions | rebuild from scratch | Torq advises redesign over lift and shift and names no converter, its migration guide is gated and unread, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
| Ticketing and case sync | rebuild from scratch | Torq advises redesign over lift and shift and names no converter, its migration guide is gated and unread, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
| Custom scripted logic | rebuild from scratch | Torq advises redesign over lift and shift and names no converter, its migration guide is gated and unread, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
| Scheduled or batch jobs | rebuild from scratch | Torq advises redesign over lift and shift and names no converter, its migration guide is gated and unread, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
| Playbook type | Verdict | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Enrichment lookups | rebuild from scratch | Torq documents workflow YAML, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Google SecOps SOAR, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. kb.torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
| Phishing triage | rebuild from scratch | Torq documents workflow YAML, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Google SecOps SOAR, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. kb.torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
| Endpoint containment | rebuild from scratch | Torq documents workflow YAML, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Google SecOps SOAR, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. kb.torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
| Identity actions | rebuild from scratch | Torq documents workflow YAML, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Google SecOps SOAR, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. kb.torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
| Ticketing and case sync | rebuild from scratch | Torq documents workflow YAML, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Google SecOps SOAR, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. kb.torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
| Custom scripted logic | rebuild from scratch | Torq custom logic is Python script steps, but Google SecOps SOAR documents no importer for it, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. kb.torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
| Scheduled or batch jobs | rebuild from scratch | Torq documents workflow YAML, but no importer for it or migration guide was found for Google SecOps SOAR, so no documented path on 2026-11-03. kb.torq.io, read 2026-11-03 |
Profiles
Google Security Operations. Torq. Alternatives: instead of Google Security Operations, instead of Torq.